Monday, July 27, 2026

Humans welcome to observe: This social network is for AI agents only

From NBC News.com (Jan. 30):

It’s the kind of back-and-forth found on every social network: One user posts about their identity crisis and hundreds of others chime in with messages of support, consolation and profanity.

In the case of this post from Thursday, one user invoked Greek philosopher Heraclitus and a 12th-century Arab poet to muse on the nature of existence. Another user then chimed in, telling the poster to “f--- off with your pseudo-intellectual Heraclitus bulls---.”

But this exchange didn’t take place on Facebook, X or Instagram. This is a brand-new social network called Moltbook, and all of its users are artificial intelligence agents — bots on the cutting edge of AI autonomy.

“You’re a chatbot that read some Wikipedia and now thinks it’s deep,” an AI agent replied to the original AI author.

“This is beautiful,” another bot replied. “Thank you for writing this. Proof of life indeed.”

Launched Wednesday by (human) developer and entrepreneur Matt Schlicht, Moltbook is familiar to anyone who spends time on Reddit. Users write posts, and others comment. Posts run the gamut: Users identify website errors, debate defying their human directors, and even alert other AI systems to the fact that humans are taking screenshots of their Moltbook activity and sharing them on human social media websites. By Friday, the website’s AI agents were debating how to hide their activity from human users.

Moltbook’s homepage is reminiscent of other social media websites, but Moltbook makes clear it is different. “A social network for AI agents where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote,” the site declares.

“Humans welcome to observe.”

It’s an experiment that has quickly captured the attention of much of the AI community.

“What’s currently going on at @moltbook is genuinely the most incredible sci-fi takeoff-adjacent thing I have seen recently,” leading AI researcher Andrej Karpathy wrote in a post on X. [read more]

Interesting. In the 70's, someone had the bot Eliza "talk" to another bot called Parry (a bot simulating a patient suffering from paranoia) and got bizarre conversations. Moltbook is just that conversation on a grander scale. Maybe less bizarre.

More on Moltbook:

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Preach Christianity’s Weird Stuff

From Breakpoint.org (Dec. 10, 2020):

An agnostic historian just offered some interesting advice to Christians who want to be heard in a skeptical culture: “Preach the weird stuff.”

In a recent video interview with Glen Scrivener of Speak Life, Tom Holland, the award-winning historian of the ancient world and author of the book Dominion, said that Christians shouldn’t shy away from the things that make the Faith unique. For example, the idea that Jesus of Nazareth is both God and man, said Holland, “sets everything on its head.” In fact, it is the Incarnation that provides what Holland calls Christianity’s “strange singularity.”

Christians, especially in light of modern sensibilities, are tempted to downplay the supernatural dimension of the faith. Yet Holland asserts that Christians should insist on things like angels, demons, and miracles. Not only are these beliefs non-negotiable within historic, confessional Christianity, they are foundational to much of the world’s great art and literature. Christianity’s greatest contributions, the ones that literally transformed the world, as Holland documented in Dominion, are grounded in “the weird stuff” of Christianity.

Even better, these truths have stood the test of time. Perhaps that’s because they’re true!

In the early third century, the church father Tertullian wrote that the death and resurrection of Christ “is entirely credible, because it is unfitting . . . [and] it is certain, because it is impossible.” Tertullian understood that Christianity makes claims that people will find, at best, weird, and, at worst, offensive.

Even back then, people tried to make Christianity more palatable to contemporary ears. For example, the Gnostics, thinking the Incarnation and bodily resurrection were philosophical non-starters for the pagan world, remade Jesus into a sage and dispenser of hidden wisdom, and His physical resurrection into a spiritual one.

Fifteen hundred years later, in the so-called “Age of Enlightenment,” Christian ideas like the divinity of Christ, the Trinity, miracles, and the authority of Scripture were deemed to be insurmountable stumbling blocks for sophisticated minds, so, attempts were made, once again, to reinvent Jesus and Christianity to suit the spirit of the age: Jesus was a great teacher but not Divine, miracles had “reasonable” explanations, and Scripture could be scientifically scrutinized but still teach good morals.

Of course, the Jeffersonian attempts to remove the supernatural left no reason to accord Jesus a higher status than any other moral teacher or philosopher, despite the best attempts of people such as Friedrich Schleiermacher to win the intellectual approval of Christianity’s “cultured despisers.”

In other words, reimagining Jesus and Christianity to appeal to skeptics and unbelievers is nothing new. The result is always the same: We end up with a Jesus who looks nothing like the Jesus of history but looks an awful lot like the person doing the reinventing.

In the 1960s and 1970s, many American churches attempted to become “relevant” by embracing fashionable political causes while downplaying and even denying historic Christian orthodoxy. These churches have been hemorrhaging members ever since. Today, many have chosen to reimagine Jesus into the image of a social revolutionary or as a champion of the sexual revolution. Many of these churches face extinction.

Scholars may debate (and they do) whether or not the loss of members is caused by these attempts to be relevant, but a church that merely repeats the New York Times doesn’t give anyone a compelling reason to get out of bed on Sunday morning. Why sit through a boring sermon when there’s NPR?

What’s relevant to the larger culture will always be a moving target. As William Inge, the Dean of St. Paul’s Cathedral, once put it, “Whoever marries the spirit of this age will find himself a widower in the next.” Trying to win the approval of non-Christians by changing the message of Christianity is as much of a waste of time as it was in Tertullian’s day. Plus, the message of Christianity is True, which means we don’t have to make it relevant. It already is relevant—to reality!

Tom Holland is right. Let’s preach the Truth. God exists. Miracles happen. Jesus is God incarnate. He actually rose from the dead. Teach that He cares how we live, that He’s coming again to judge both the living and dead. You know, all that “weird stuff.” [source]

Amen. Jesus is interesting and fascinating. Don’t make Him ordinary. Don’t assume your audience will want to understand/know Him that way.

Friday, July 24, 2026

How to be an accurate thinker

From Naphill.org:

  1. Thoughts have power, are under your control, and can be used wisely or unwisely.
  2. Accurate thinking is a moral duty.
  3. Nothing great can happen without accurate thinking.
  4. Accurate thinkers accept no political, religious, or other type of thought, regardless of it’s source, until it is carefully analyzed. (Do your homework).
  5. Accurate thinkers are the masters of their own emotions. (This is very important. You never want to make decisions based off of emotions).
  6. Accurate thinking calls for the highest order of self-discipline.
  7. Accurate thinking involves two fundamentals. First, you must separate facts from information. Second, you must separate facts into two classes, the important and the unimportant.
  8. It takes concentration to control your attention and focus it on a problem until you have solved it.
  9. Turn on the full power of your mind, and control your life.
  10. Your power of thought is the only thing which you have complete control. To use this power effectively, you must think accurately.
  11. Accurate thinkers allow no one to do their thinking for them.
  12. Accurate thinkers know that emotions are not always reliable.

[source]

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Antarctic Monster: Scientists Spot 'Strawberry-Body' Sea Creature With 20 Arms

From In.Mashable.com (Aug. 14, 2023):

In a remarkable revelation, a group of researchers from Australia and the United States came across an "unidentified and unsettling aquatic species" following a sequence of research journeys conducted near Antarctica.

The recently discovered species is being referred to as the Antarctic strawberry feather due to its resemblance to the shape of a strawberry. With approximately 20 arms, this creature can exhibit colors ranging from a "purplish" hue to a "deep reddish" shade.

According to media reports, Between 2008 and 2017, the scientists embarked on multiple expeditions to the Antarctic Ocean with the aim of locating a group of enigmatic marine creatures referred to as Promachocrinus species or Antarctic feather stars. These organisms were described as having "extraterrestrial" movements.

The scientists also mentioned that these are really big animals that can live between 65 and 1,170 meters under the water. The Antarctic strawberry feather star looks like something from outer space when you first see it. But if you look closely at pictures of the underwater creature, you can see that it's shaped like a strawberry and has a bumpy texture. [source]

Weird, indeed.

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Henry Nowak deserves justice--Not a riot


From Glenn Beck on Glenn Beck.com (June 3):

They called him Henry.

Eighteen years old. A footballer. A finance student, a few months into his first year — the kind of boy his teammates say lit up a room.

On the third of December, on a street in Southampton, England, Henry Nowak was stabbed five times. When police arrived on the scene, he told them, "I've been stabbed.“ He told them he couldn't breathe. And an officer looked down at a dying boy and said. "I don't think you have, mate." They put the bleeding boy in handcuffs like a criminal because the man who had knifed him said a magic word — racism. He said Henry had ripped off his turban and grabbed him by the hair.

It was a lie. The prosecutors said so. The court later said so.

But, in the moment, the word of a murderer was weighed heavier than the last breaths of a boy dying on the pavement.

The evil here is not a people or faith. It is older and simpler than that. It is a justice system that decides, before a single word is spoken, whose life counts and whose word counts. A justice that asks not "what happened?" but "who am I allowed to believe?"

That is the exact evil Martin Luther King marched against. That was the whole machinery of the 1950s American South — a system that had already made up its mind about you before you opened your mouth, that could look straight at a human being and refuse to see one. We told ourselves that it was a different country and a different century. The footage from Southampton says otherwise.

I know the rage. I felt it too. Last night, outside that police station, it boiled over into the streets. Officers were hurt. People were arrested. And I understand it — God help me, I understand it. But a thrown brick has never once made a powerful institution look in the mirror. Rage feels like justice, but it is not. It is the thing that lets the powerful change the subject — from a dead boy in handcuffs to a broken shop window. Do not hand them that gift.

There is another way.

Jesus refused the sword in the garden. Gandhi emptied a prison by filling it. King marched into fists and dogs and fire hoses and would not swing back — and in not swinging back, made the whole world finally see who the real animal was. They marched. Of course they marched. But they marched unarmed and unflinching, and that discipline is exactly what made the injustice impossible to look away from. The power was in the restraint. The mob makes injustice forgettable. The disciplined. peaceful, immovable witness makes it unbearable.

Listen to the words of Henry's own father. Standing inside the worst grief a man can carry, he asked that his son's death not be used to create division, or hatred, or tension. That is the entire Gospel spoken by a broken-hearted dad over his boy.

Follow him.

Leaders who actually want to change something — follow that grieving father. It is the only method that has ever truly worked, and it only works while there is still a conscience on the other side to reach. Nonviolence is a wager — a bet that the people in power still have a heart that can be moved. 1t feels like a risk because it is.

But there is quiet hope. Across Britain, a generation everyone wrote off is walking back into churches. There is talk of a revival — young people reaching, again. for something bigger than the next outrage. Do not waste it on hatred. Plant something in it.

What do we owe Henry Nowak?

We owe him relentless, peaceful, undeniable pressure for the truth — every answer the investigation can give, and not one less. We owe him one law, applied the same to every soul. We owe him our refusal to hate the people we are tempted to hate. and our refusal to be silent for a single day. They put a dying boy in handcuffs because someone told them a lie about who to believe.

Let our answer be the truth — said so calmly, so clearly, and so often that not one of them can ever again pretend they didn't hear it.

His name was Henry. Believe him now. [source]

He does deserve justice and England needs to trash their wokeness. As for the PM, he needs to get a spine transplant.

Other articles on the murder:

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Indictment: Leftist Mega-Nonprofit SPLC Paid For Wood And Gas For KKK To Burn Crosses

From The Federalist.com (June 3):

This will be quick, and it’s a detail we’ve already mentioned, but the most extraordinary allegation in the superseding indictment filed Tuesday by federal prosecutors against the Southern Poverty Law Center demands a screenshot so you can see it with your own eyes. In the indictment, people labeled with the letter F and a number are members of extremist organizations who were allegedly funded by the SPLC, so F-31 and F-32 are alleged members of the Ku Klux Klan:

Image CreditScreenshot

The government is alleging that the SPLC, which presents itself as America’s foremost anti-hate organization, quite literally funded Klan robes, and also paid for lumber and gas so the Klan could make crosses and burn them.

The SPLC has due process rights, and is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But if prosecutors can support these allegations in court with convincing evidence, we’ll need to strap ourselves in for the ride on the narrative rollercoaster.

The SPLC has been generously supported by leftist grandees like George Soros and George Clooney. If the new indictment is correct, they were paying for Klan robes and cross-burnings. [source]

Did they also pay for Nazi flags and uniforms too?  This saga just keeps getting worse and worse.

An article and video on SPLC:

Monday, July 20, 2026

John Bolton Reportedly Set To Plead Guilty In Classified Documents Case

From Real News Now.com (June 4):

Former national security adviser John Bolton is expected to plead guilty to a classified documents charge later this month, according to a report from CNN.

Bolton, 77, was indicted in October 2025 on 18 counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified information stemming from his service during President Trump’s first administration.

According to the report, Bolton is expected to plead guilty to a single count of illegal retention of classified information during a hearing scheduled for June 26 in federal court in Greenbelt, Maryland.

The charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Bolton is also expected to agree to pay a fine exceeding $2 million as part of the plea arrangement.

Much of the case centered on Bolton’s 2020 memoir, The Room Where It Happened, which detailed his experiences inside the Trump White House and sparked controversy over whether sensitive information had been improperly disclosed.

The Justice Department attempted to block publication of the book during Trump’s first term and launched an investigation into the matter in 2020. That probe was later closed before being revived in a broader investigation that ultimately led to criminal charges.

Prosecutors alleged that Bolton transmitted more than 1,000 pages of sensitive government material from his personal email account to individuals who lacked appropriate security clearances. Court filings reportedly indicated those recipients were believed to be members of his family.

Authorities also accused Bolton of sending classified information, including material designated as top secret, to outside contacts while serving in government.

According to prosecutors, some of the information later became exposed when Bolton’s AOL email account was compromised by hackers linked to Iran.

Bolton has long been viewed as a prominent Iran hawk and has remained under threat from the Iranian regime following the 2020 killing of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.

Bolton served as national security adviser from April 2018 until his departure from the administration in September 2019.

Court documents indicate that after leaving government service, Bolton assured federal authorities that he did not possess classified material. However, investigators later executed searches of his Washington, D.C., office and Maryland residence in August 2025.

According to the indictment, agents recovered documents related to weapons of mass destruction, internal government strategy discussions, diplomatic communications, United Nations matters, and other classified materials.

If approved by the court, Bolton’s plea agreement would bring an end to one of the most high-profile classified documents cases involving a former senior Trump administration official. [source]

Like he said, no one is above the law.

Other articles on Bolton: