Henry Nowak deserves justice--Not a riot

From Glenn Beck on Glenn Beck.com (June 3):

They called him Henry.

Eighteen years old. A footballer. A finance student, a few months into his first year — the kind of boy his teammates say lit up a room.

On the third of December, on a street in Southampton, England, Henry Nowak was stabbed five times. When police arrived on the scene, he told them, "I've been stabbed.“ He told them he couldn't breathe. And an officer looked down at a dying boy and said. "I don't think you have, mate." They put the bleeding boy in handcuffs like a criminal because the man who had knifed him said a magic word — racism. He said Henry had ripped off his turban and grabbed him by the hair.

It was a lie. The prosecutors said so. The court later said so.

But, in the moment, the word of a murderer was weighed heavier than the last breaths of a boy dying on the pavement.

The evil here is not a people or faith. It is older and simpler than that. It is a justice system that decides, before a single word is spoken, whose life counts and whose word counts. A justice that asks not "what happened?" but "who am I allowed to believe?"

That is the exact evil Martin Luther King marched against. That was the whole machinery of the 1950s American South — a system that had already made up its mind about you before you opened your mouth, that could look straight at a human being and refuse to see one. We told ourselves that it was a different country and a different century. The footage from Southampton says otherwise.

I know the rage. I felt it too. Last night, outside that police station, it boiled over into the streets. Officers were hurt. People were arrested. And I understand it — God help me, I understand it. But a thrown brick has never once made a powerful institution look in the mirror. Rage feels like justice, but it is not. It is the thing that lets the powerful change the subject — from a dead boy in handcuffs to a broken shop window. Do not hand them that gift.

There is another way.

Jesus refused the sword in the garden. Gandhi emptied a prison by filling it. King marched into fists and dogs and fire hoses and would not swing back — and in not swinging back, made the whole world finally see who the real animal was. They marched. Of course they marched. But they marched unarmed and unflinching, and that discipline is exactly what made the injustice impossible to look away from. The power was in the restraint. The mob makes injustice forgettable. The disciplined. peaceful, immovable witness makes it unbearable.

Listen to the words of Henry's own father. Standing inside the worst grief a man can carry, he asked that his son's death not be used to create division, or hatred, or tension. That is the entire Gospel spoken by a broken-hearted dad over his boy.

Follow him.

Leaders who actually want to change something — follow that grieving father. It is the only method that has ever truly worked, and it only works while there is still a conscience on the other side to reach. Nonviolence is a wager — a bet that the people in power still have a heart that can be moved. 1t feels like a risk because it is.

But there is quiet hope. Across Britain, a generation everyone wrote off is walking back into churches. There is talk of a revival — young people reaching, again. for something bigger than the next outrage. Do not waste it on hatred. Plant something in it.

What do we owe Henry Nowak?

We owe him relentless, peaceful, undeniable pressure for the truth — every answer the investigation can give, and not one less. We owe him one law, applied the same to every soul. We owe him our refusal to hate the people we are tempted to hate. and our refusal to be silent for a single day. They put a dying boy in handcuffs because someone told them a lie about who to believe.

Let our answer be the truth — said so calmly, so clearly, and so often that not one of them can ever again pretend they didn't hear it.

His name was Henry. Believe him now. [source]

He does deserve justice and England needs to trash their wokeness. As for the PM, he needs to get a spine transplant.

Other articles on the murder:

• Henry Nowak’s Murder Is The Logical End Of Black Lives Matter
• Britain's Censorship Regime Helped Kill Henry Nowak

Indictment: Leftist Mega-Nonprofit SPLC Paid For Wood And Gas For KKK To Burn Crosses

From The Federalist.com (June 3):

This will be quick, and it’s a detail we’ve already mentioned, but the most extraordinary allegation in the superseding indictment filed Tuesday by federal prosecutors against the Southern Poverty Law Center demands a screenshot so you can see it with your own eyes. In the indictment, people labeled with the letter F and a number are members of extremist organizations who were allegedly funded by the SPLC, so F-31 and F-32 are alleged members of the Ku Klux Klan:

Image CreditScreenshot

The government is alleging that the SPLC, which presents itself as America’s foremost anti-hate organization, quite literally funded Klan robes, and also paid for lumber and gas so the Klan could make crosses and burn them.

The SPLC has due process rights, and is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But if prosecutors can support these allegations in court with convincing evidence, we’ll need to strap ourselves in for the ride on the narrative rollercoaster.

The SPLC has been generously supported by leftist grandees like George Soros and George Clooney. If the new indictment is correct, they were paying for Klan robes and cross-burnings. [source]

Did they also pay for Nazi flags and uniforms too?  This saga just keeps getting worse and worse.

An article and video on SPLC:

• Dems Defend Giving SPLC Police Power To Target Conservatives
• Klan Hoods and WORSE Paid for by LEFTIST Group?! [video]

John Bolton Reportedly Set To Plead Guilty In Classified Documents Case

From Real News Now.com (June 4):

Former national security adviser John Bolton is expected to plead guilty to a classified documents charge later this month, according to a report from CNN.

Bolton, 77, was indicted in October 2025 on 18 counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified information stemming from his service during President Trump’s first administration.

According to the report, Bolton is expected to plead guilty to a single count of illegal retention of classified information during a hearing scheduled for June 26 in federal court in Greenbelt, Maryland.

The charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Bolton is also expected to agree to pay a fine exceeding $2 million as part of the plea arrangement.

Much of the case centered on Bolton’s 2020 memoir, The Room Where It Happened, which detailed his experiences inside the Trump White House and sparked controversy over whether sensitive information had been improperly disclosed.

The Justice Department attempted to block publication of the book during Trump’s first term and launched an investigation into the matter in 2020. That probe was later closed before being revived in a broader investigation that ultimately led to criminal charges.

Prosecutors alleged that Bolton transmitted more than 1,000 pages of sensitive government material from his personal email account to individuals who lacked appropriate security clearances. Court filings reportedly indicated those recipients were believed to be members of his family.

Authorities also accused Bolton of sending classified information, including material designated as top secret, to outside contacts while serving in government.

According to prosecutors, some of the information later became exposed when Bolton’s AOL email account was compromised by hackers linked to Iran.

Bolton has long been viewed as a prominent Iran hawk and has remained under threat from the Iranian regime following the 2020 killing of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.

Bolton served as national security adviser from April 2018 until his departure from the administration in September 2019.

Court documents indicate that after leaving government service, Bolton assured federal authorities that he did not possess classified material. However, investigators later executed searches of his Washington, D.C., office and Maryland residence in August 2025.

According to the indictment, agents recovered documents related to weapons of mass destruction, internal government strategy discussions, diplomatic communications, United Nations matters, and other classified materials.

If approved by the court, Bolton’s plea agreement would bring an end to one of the most high-profile classified documents cases involving a former senior Trump administration official. [source]

Like he said, no one is above the law.

Other articles on Bolton:

• Bolton's Guilty Plea Makes Media Attacks On DOJ Look Ridiculous
• Good Luck, Mr. Moustache! BOLTON EXPECTED TO PLEAD GUILTY - 6.4.26 – HCRN
  

'Trap from the 'devil': Priest warns Christians not to play 'Holy Spirit' Ouija board game

From Christian Post.com (Apr. 14, 2023):

A new board game marketed as a “Christian” version of the Ouija board has been criticized as satanic and a "trap from the devil."

Named “The Holy Spirit Board by Holy Spirit Games - Christian Religious Talking Board for Séance with Planchette,” the game advertises itself on Amazon as a way to help people talk directly to "our lord and savior Jesus Christ!"

“GET THE ANSWERS YOU NEED! — The Holy Spirit Board can answer all of life’s most important questions, straight from the man himself!” the board's description adds. "Unlike other spirit boards that are often used to contact ghosts and demons, this is a one way ticket straight to heaven."

While the board's layout looks similar to a Ouija board, it differs by including an image of Jesus crucified on the cross, three angels, a dove and a cross to be moved around on the board.

In a recent interview with EWTN's "News Nightly," Roman Catholic Father Ernesto Caro of the Diocese of Monterey, Mexico, who's also an exorcist, criticized the board game as a “trap from the devil.” 

“The devil is always looking for different ways he can trap all the victims that he can take for him. And this is one,” Caro said in the segment. “Ouija games and all this are forbidden in the Bible.”

Caro said the Holy Spirit Board was created to deceive Catholics and Christians by using religious imagery they're familiar with. He warned that it's no different than a Ouija board deployed to capture believers. “Ouija games ... and all this are forbidden in the Bible.”

The priest further warned that the board could potentially start “opening a door that could be dangerous for you" and that a player might "think that it is God who is talking with you, but it’s not. If the [Ouija board] triangle is moving by itself, be careful. It’s not God who is moving; it’s the devil,” Caro added.

The Catholic Church rejects and condemns the use of Ouija boards labeling it an occult participation and divination, according to No. 2116 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

"All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to ‘unveil’ the future. Consulting horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all … contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone," states the Catechism.

When host Tracy Sabol asked Caro what people should do if they have bought the game, Caro said they should dispose of the board as quickly as possible, go to confession and “repent and ask God for liberation” through a priest’s blessings for protection. [source]

Probably not a good idea. A person might conjure up an evil spirit or even a demon like the Zozo. You never really know.

Yes, They Were Socialists: How the Nazis Waged War on Private Property

From Mises.org (July 5, 2022):

When the average person thinks of the Nazis, what often comes to mind is World War II, the Holocaust, and rousing speeches of hate. However, the National Socialists also had economic and political policies, policies many just assume were either free market or New Deal–style public works projects like the Autobahn. But Nazi policy was not so cut-and-dried.

The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.

How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.

With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party.

The War on Business

Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:

Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices.

The Nazis, ironically, called this reorganization “privatization,” although the owners of these corporations were either removed from board positions and replaced by Nazi Party members or sold out and became Nazi Party members. They included IG Farben and the Junkers airplane factory. IG Farben was a chemical company founded in 1925 by Carl Bosch and Carl Duisberg, who were both Jewish, and had a capitalization of around a billion marks by 1926. By 1938, all of the company’s Jewish workers had been purged and the supervisory board replaced by Nazis (see Joseph Borkin’s book The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben).

IG Farben was a clear example of the reorganization of industry the Nazis undertook for their benefit. Sybille Steinbacher, a professor of Holocaust studies, wrote about the public-private partnership in her book Auschwitz, stating:

Otto Ambros and IG Farben director Fritz ter Meer held a board meeting in Berlin with Carl Krauch who was not only a member of the board of directors of IG Farben, but also a member of the circle of industrialists around Reichsfurhrer-SS known as Himmler’s “Circle of Friends.”

After the Nazis took power, this kind of cooperation was common. Private businesses became merely public entities, and industrialists who resisted the Nazi commissars and their policies were removed from their positions and their businesses seized.

Junkers airplane factory did not fare much better, according to Temin, who wrote:

Prof. Junkers of the Junkers airplane factory refused to follow the government’s bidding in 1934. The Nazis thereupon took over the plant, compensating Junkers for his loss. This was the context in which other contracts were negotiated.

This Nazi war on business left industrialists and other businessmen worried that they would have their livelihoods stolen from them, as Günter Reimann explains in The Vampire Economy.

Reimann quotes a letter from a German businessman to an American businessman:

The difference between this and the Russian system is much less than you think, despite the fact that officially we are still independent businessmen.

The letter continues:

Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.

This German businessman also complained of “arbitrary government decisions concerning quantity, quality, and prices of foreign raw materials.” But businessmen were not the only members of the private sector who faced mass amounts of bureaucracy and control. The farmers faced it as well. [read more]

And just think most of the Left won’t denounce a Nazi sympathizer candidate in their own party.

The Remaking of America

From AM Greatness.com (Aug. 7, 2023):

We are in the midst of one of the most radical revolutions in American history. It is as far-reaching and dangerous as the turbulent years of the 1850s and 1860s or the 1930s. Every aspect of American life and culture is under assault, including the very processes by which we govern ourselves, and the manner in which we live.

The Revolution began under the Obama administration that sought to divide Americans into oppressed and oppressors, and then substitute race for class victimization. It was empowered by the bicoastal wealth accrued from globalization, and honed during the COVID lockdown, quarantine-fed economic downturn, and the George Floyd riots and their aftermath. The Revolution was boosted by fanatic opposition to the presidency of Donald Trump. And the result is an America that is unrecognizable from what it was a mere decade ago.

Here are 10 upheavals that the Left has successfully wrought.

Free expression. In large swatches of American society—particularly the corporation, the media, the government, the public schools, and the university—it is suddenly dangerous to speak freely. At a DEI workshop, politely object that “whiteness” does not account for all the challenges of “marginalized peoples,” and you will become either ostracized, reprimanded, or perhaps fired.

Suggest to a class that man-made climate change and the state remedies for it, are still under debate—and your career and livelihood are endangered. In 2020, state that Covid lockdowns would do more eventual damage than the virus—and your career was through. Express doubt that there are more than two biological sexes, and if an athlete or high school principal you will be shunned or rendered professionally inert.

The government, in league with social media, censors the news. “Liberal” universities often first require McCarthy-era type “diversity” statements for one to be hired. Commissars review syllabi to spot incorrect or improper speech or insufficient DEI zeal.

The Left now seeks to modify the First Amendment, and its empowerment of “hate speech,” defined as most anything impeding the progressive project. The state and the universities properly issue word lists of approved vocabularies.

The old ACLU or Sen. Church Committee would now probably be deemed rightwing. The methodologies of Joseph McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover are the preferred models, once they were rebooted to the right cause.

The Weaponization of Justice. Administrations and their efforts to stock the justice department with supporters come and go. But in the last decade the Left has viewed the Department of Justice as a political extension of the party—whose unchecked power must properly be directed to hurt enemies and help friends. No wonder Eric Holder described himself as Obama’s “wingman” and became the first Attorney General to be held in contempt for ignoring a congressional subpoena.

Never in U.S. history have the Department of Justice and sympathetic state and local prosecutors indicted a leading opposition candidate and likely nominee of one of the two major parties, and at the beginning of a presidential campaign. Donald Trump is currently charged with nearly 100 felonies by at least two prosecutors. He likely eventually will be hit with more than- 500 indictments, from four prosecutors, every one of the latter with a long record of either leftwing associations or Democratic service.

The mass murderer Charles Manson faced less legal exposure. No one believes Trump would have been indicted on such counts—most of them involving allegations from years past—were he not running for President.

One count that Donald Trump is not charged with is bribery, or taking money while in office, a crime cited as impeachable in the Constitution and germane to the accusations that Joe Biden and his family raked in millions from foreign governments due to the improper use of his prior Vice Presidency. For what reason did Joe Biden lie that he never discussed his son’s business? Why did Hunter complain to his daughter that Joe demanded half of his own grifting income? Why would a Vice President serially call disreputable American grifters and foreign corrupt oligarchs? Can Joe’s lifestyle ever be reconciled with his reported income?

Given such asymmetry in the application of the laws, conservative or even apolitical Americans are apprehensive that any political prominence will draw the attention of government in effort to either indict or bankrupt them with legal expenses.

The last four FBI Directors have either admitted they lied under oath, or preposterously under oath claimed ignorance or amnesia about events directly under their control. Or they simply stonewalled subpoenas and testimonies about alleged FBI crimes.

The former CIA Director admitted to lying twice under oath. The FBI hired social media corporations to suppress election-cycle news deemed unhelpful to the Left. The agency, along with Democratic operatives, helped hatch the election-cycle conspiracy of the 2015-2016 Russian-Collusion hoax, and the 2020 Russian disinformation laptop hoax. The FBI played a central role in many of the 2024 indictments. In other words, the FBI along with the DOJ, has sought to warp three presidential elections in a row.

On the prompt of a Joe Biden campaign official (and now Secretary of State) and a former interim CIA director, 50 former intelligence officials lied to the electorate that an authentic but incriminating Biden computer was a likely Russian plant—a fact known to be lie but not disclosed as such by the FBI. [read more]

This is the blueprint how the Left is radically transforming America. Another great article by VDH.

US forces kill senior ISIS leader in Syria: CENTCOM

From Fox News.com (June 24):

A U.S. airstrike last week in Syria killed a top ISIS leader, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced on Wednesday.

CENTCOM "forces conducted an airstrike in northwest Syria, June 19, that resulted in the death of a senior ISIS leader," according to a press release.

"The precision strike killed Ali Husayn al-‘Ulaywi and is part of ongoing U.S. efforts to disrupt and eliminate terrorists seeking to attack Americans abroad or the U.S. homeland. CENTCOM forces continue to work alongside regional partners," CENTCOM added.

"CENTCOM and our partners remain committed to rooting out remaining remnants of ISIS to ensure its enduring defeat," CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper said in a statement. "We will continue to defend the U.S. homeland, our service members, and allies and partners across the region."

The Middle East is not the only area where the American military has been active lately.

The U.S. military conducted a deadly strike killing three alleged "narco-terrorists" on June 18, according to U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).

"Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations. Three male narco-terrorists were killed during this action," SOUTHCOM noted.

SOUTHCOM also reported another strike days later.

"On June 21, at the direction of the commander of U.S. Southern Command, Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations," SOUTHCOM reported.

"Two male narco-terrorists were killed during this action, and there were six male survivors. Following the engagement, USSOUTHCOM immediately notified U.S. Coast Guard to activate the Search and Rescue system for the survivors," according to SOUTHCOM. [source]

Another terrorist dead. Good.