Monday, June 30, 2025

Trump Says He Would ‘Absolutely’ Sign Ban On Congressional Stock Trading

From OANN.com (Apr. 25):

President Donald Trump stated in a TIME Magazine interview, which was published on Friday, that he would “absolutely” sign legislation prohibiting members of Congress from trading stocks, should such a bill reach his desk.

In addition to discussing the first 100 days of his second term, Trump made the comments during the interview. During the discussion, Trump was asked if he would support a ban on Congressional stock trading, to which he responded: “Absolutely.”

“I watched [former House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi [D-Calif.] get rich through insider information, and I would be OK with [banning] it. If they send that to me, I would do it,” he said, asserting that he would sign the hypothetical piece of legislation.

Pelosi, the former Democrat House speaker, who is still considered a top leader of the Democrat Party, has long faced criticism for resisting efforts to prohibit stock trading by lawmakers and their families.

Her husband, Paul Pelosi, who owns and operates Financial Leasing Services, has also made millions through stock trades that have drawn public scrutiny — with critics pointing to the timing of some transactions in relation to Congressional activities.

The debate around lawmakers trading individual stocks has persisted for years, fueled by concerns over conflicts of interest. Members of Congress have access to classified information and early insight into pending legislation — leading to easier methods of insider trading.

In 2020, a bipartisan group of senators faced backlash after trading healthcare stocks following private briefings on the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite widespread public and bipartisan support for reform, efforts to ban Congressional stock trading have repeatedly stalled on Capitol Hill. The previous related measure aimed to prohibit not just lawmakers, but also, their spouses and dependent children from trading stocks. However, the measure failed to reach a full vote in the Senate. [source]

Great!  Good to hear! The question remains does Congress have the guts to pass a bill to ban this?  They should but will they? Probably not.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

What makes human beings men and women?

From Christian Post.com (Mar. 24, 2023):

What makes human beings men and women? A couple of decades ago, the answer to this question was rather obvious, but not so in our present culture. What was once an obvious biological reality has now been hijacked and corrupted by moral relativism and the sexual revolution.

Transgender activists have succeeded in sowing mass confusion on the issue of sex and gender, and this confusion has ignited a new front in the culture wars that few people outside of evangelical Christian thinkers anticipated. In order to make sense of it all, we need to understand transgender ideology and what the Bible says about gender.

What is transgenderism?

Transgenderism maintains that gender is distinct from, and at times in conflict with, biological sex. According to transgender activists, gender is a social construct and gender identity is a subjective state of self-understanding. The “real self” is not biologically based, but psychologically based.

By this thinking, the “real self” is defined by one’s gender identify: a person is the gender they experience themselves to be. Unlike a traditional view that attaches gender to biological sex, transgenderism detaches gender from sex, and it does so in several ways.

Transgenderism claims that a person’s biological sex does not determine their identity. Rather, a person can identify as either pole on the gender binary (man or woman); they can identify as “fluid,” meaning they are somewhere in between the two poles of the gender binary; or they can even deny the gender binary completely and identify as something outside of it (i.e. non-binary).

The basic goal of transgender activists, therefore, is gender deconstruction. Since they believe that traditional understandings of gender — wherein gender is biologically based — is a cultural construct, it can be replaced with a new gender paradigm.

Transgender ideology suffers from many philosophical problems (too many, in fact, to cover at length in this article). For example, transgenderism claims that gender is a cultural construct, but maintains that gender identity is innate; that is, natural or naturally belonging to a person. This is clearly inconsistent.

As Ryan T. Anderson points out in his book When Harry Became Sally, if gender is a social construct, then gender identity is too. Also, transgenderism’s mind-body dualism — where “real self” is psychologically based, not biologically based — can apply to other concepts besides gender identity. To be logically consistent, transgender activists must accept and affirm trans-species, trans-racial, trans-ability, and trans-age communities.

Aside from its incoherence, transgender ideology has enormous political, economic, cultural, and medical ramifications. Gender identity, not biological sex, is now used in many hospitals to determine the proper medical treatment for patients, including minors. Transgender activists are undermining protections for women and children in sports, education, public accommodations, military, and prisons. Transgender ideology also threatens religious liberty and freedom of conscience for Christian schools, businesses, and individuals.

So, what should Christians think about transgenderism? [read more]

Friday, June 27, 2025

G20 meets to plan YOUR future, your resources, your rights and your land

From Glenn Beck.com (Sept. 24, 2023):

This is a really important story. The G20 met earlier this month in India. The G20 is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, meeting for global economic superpowers that occurs each year. China’s Xi and Russia’s Putin did not attend, even though they are G20 leaders, so the U.S. and India took an even bigger role than usual.

At this year’s event, the G20 produced a statement called the “G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration.” In it, the G20 published a rough outline of its policy plans and priorities for member nations. Keep in mind that these are the priorities the countries agreed on, so there is a general consensus on the Declaration.

The reason the New Delhi Declaration is important is because it provides an exceptional look into the globalist, Great Reset playbook for the next year and longer. All of this is leading up to an incredibly important United Nations meeting in September 2024 called “Summit for the Future,” where a new international pact will be formally approved. Globalist elites are showing us their cards. All we have to do is look at them.

What’s in the Declaration?

To say the New Delhi Declaration is radical is a major understatement. It’s the Great Reset on steroids. The document is 37 pages long, with each page containing numerous bullet-point agenda items for creating a New World Order.

There are literally hundreds of points in the document, so I couldn’t possibly go through them all now, but here are just some of the highlights:

1. An international commitment to dramatically scale back the use of private and public lands.

The G20 committed to “restoring by 2030 at least 30 percent of all degraded ecosystems and scaling up efforts to achieve land degradation neutrality.”

2. A commitment to “halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030.”

That would effectively mean not only the end of land development, but also the return of land that’s currently occupied by humans to nature. How can we possibly feed the world’s growing population with a commitment like this? (By the way, we warned about this in Dark Future.)

3. A plan for “international governance for AI.”

According to the document, member nations should “ensure” that AI is developed “responsibly,” which means, among other things, designers take “ethics” and “biases” into account. That would be a good thing if elites agreed with our understanding of "ethics" and "biases," but they don't. They want to use AI to promote ESG, DEI, and other social justice ideas.

Further, the nations committed to promoting AI that’s designed to accomplish the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that the SDGs are the foundation for the Great Reset, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and nearly every other significant globalist proposal made over the past three decades. That's not my interpretation—that's what the leaders of all of those plans repeatedly said. (All of this is predicted in Dark Future too.) [read more]

One step closer to the New World Order. Surprised smile

Thursday, June 26, 2025

The CIA is building its version of ChatGPT

From Pop Sci.com (Sept. 27, 2023):

The Central Intelligence Agency confirmed it is building a ChatGPT-style AI for use across the US intelligence community. Speaking with Bloomberg on Tuesday, Randy Nixon, director of the CIA’s Open-Source Enterprise, described the project as a logical technological step forward for a vast 18-agency network that includes the CIA, NSA, FBI, and various military offices. The large language model (LLM) chatbot will reportedly provide summations of open-source materials alongside citations, as well as chat with users, according to Bloomberg.

“Then you can take it to the next level and start chatting and asking questions of the machines to give you answers, also sourced. Our collection can just continue to grow and grow with no limitations other than how much things cost,” Nixon said.

“We’ve gone from newspapers and radio, to newspapers and television, to newspapers and cable television, to basic internet, to big data, and it just keeps going,” Nixon continued, adding, “We have to find the needles in the needle field.”

The announcement comes as China’s make their ambitions to become the global leader in AI technology by the decade’s end known. In August, new Chinese government regulations went into effect requiring makers of publicly available AI services submit regular security assessments. As Reuters noted in July, the oversight will likely restrict at least some technological advancements in favor of ongoing national security crackdowns. The laws are also far more stringent than those currently within the US, as regulators struggle to adapt to the industry’s rapid advancements and societal consequences.

Nixon has yet to discuss  the overall scope and capabilities of the proposed system, and would not confirm what AI model forms the basis of its LLM assistant. For years, however, US intelligence communities have explored how to best leverage AI’s vast data analysis capabilities alongside private partnerships. The CIA even hosted a “Spies Supercharged” panel during this year’s SXSW in the hopes of recruiting tech workers across sectors such as quantum computing, biotech, and AI. During the event, CIA deputy director David Cohen reiterated concerns regarding AI’s unpredictable effects for the intelligence community.

“To defeat that ubiquitous technology, if you have any good ideas, we’d be happy to hear about them afterwards,” Cohen said at the time.

Similar criticisms arrived barely two weeks ago via the CIA’s first-ever chief technology officer, Nand Mulchandani. Speaking at the Billington Cybersecurity Summit, Mulchandani contended that while some AI-based systems are “absolutely fantastic” for tasks such as vast data trove pattern analysis, “in areas where it requires precision, we’re going to be incredibly challenged.”

Mulchandani also conceded that AI’s often seemingly “hallucinatory” offerings could still be helpful to users.

“AI can give you something so far outside of your range, that it really then opens up the vista in terms of where you’re going to go,” he said at the time. “[It’s] what I call the ‘crazy drunk friend.’ [source]

Interesting. What’s the chance that other foreign intel agencies are doing this too? Very likely like China and Russia.

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

The Left Castigating Trump


From Bill OReilly.com (Mar. 4):

History often follows a pattern of behavior, such as Republicans seeking smaller government while Democrats want a larger federal footprint in order to mitigate societal wrongs.

In modern times, the American left usually opposes war. Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, just to cite a few examples.

But now it is the left that is castigating President Trump for pursuing a realistic ceasefire deal in Ukraine.  It is obvious that Putin is not going to stop murdering people unless he gets a deal that makes him look good.  So, Trump is patronizing bad Vlad, and many liberals are braying criticism because of it.

Remember, Ho Chi Minh was as evil as they come but Jane Fonda and her crew loved Uncle Ho.  It was the USA that was the villain in Southeast Asia. 

Putin is Minh's soulmate.  But the left despises Vlad and, apparently, wants to continue a brutal, unwinnable conflict in Ukraine while it wanted out of Vietnam at any cost.

It's all about Trump, of course. Whatever he does is worse than anything anybody else does. If the President wants Zelensky to lighten up on Vlad in order to stop the bloodshed, the left will find a way to oppose that so it can criticize Trump.

That's the country in which we all live. Emotion and partisan politics rule. Putin loves this. [source]

It's sad, the Left does this. Then again they can't define him and they can't  intimidate him. So, they go berserk. They will continue to persecute him until he leaves office.

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Trump authorizes his administration to open new coal-fired power plants in the U.S.

From Just the News.com (Mar. 18):

President Donald Trump says his administration will open new coal-fired power plants in the U.S.  to help the U.S. compete economically with other countries.

“After years of being held captive by Environmental Extremists, Lunatics, Radicals, and Thugs, allowing other Countries, in particular China, to gain tremendous Economic advantage over us by opening up hundreds of all Coal Fire Power Plants, I am authorizing my Administration to immediately begin producing Energy with BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL,” Trump said in a Truth Social post Monday.

The amount of electricity produced from coal declined from a high of 1,847 terawatt hours in 2010 – enough to power more than 171 million households – to a low of 675 terawatt hours in 2023 – enough to power 62.5 million homes. Approximately 40% of the remaining coal-fired capacity in the U.S. is planned to be retired by 2030, according to a 2023 study by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

Trump's announcement provided no details on how the goal would be accomplished. [source]

Nice.  More winning! Mine baby mine!

Monday, June 23, 2025

Miranda Devine: Foreign flags fly in LA anti-ICE riots — vindicating Donald Trump and leaving Dems with no moral standing


From NY Post.com (June 8):

The minute the foreign flags came out in the violent anti-ICE protests in LA over the weekend, that’s when President Trump won the moral high ground.

An iconic image showing a masked man on a motorcycle circling a burning car while holding aloft a giant Mexican flag against a backdrop of black, acrid smoke and a row of police cars captured the mood. It was the “Summer of Love” all over again — and America has had a gutful.

The president could not have asked for a better advertisement for his tough border policies. He always said that the millions of illegal aliens who swarmed over the border under President Joe Biden was an invasion, and here were the invaders making his point for him.

As a result, the Democrats have no moral standing. They are moored in no man’s land, owning Biden’s invasion and the violent masked agitators waving any flag but America’s. They own the arson and looting and attacks on police and federal agents. They own the funding mechanisms for the rent-a-riots that are traced back to their donors and their corrupt donations platform, ACT Blue.

Now that Elon Musk has gone, their street muscle has moved from torching Tesla dealerships to trying to block deportations.

Dems pick losing battle

Their poster boy is Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the illegal alien gangbanger they tried to repackage as a harmless “Maryland Man” and transform into their latest George Floyd martyr. Too bad.

Their lawfare might have gotten him un-deported from El Salvador and back on US soil. But now we see more clearly who he is, and the Trump administration’s decision to deport him looks even more justified. The Department of Justice has charged him with human trafficking of thousands of illegal aliens, including children and MS-13 gang members. Federal prosecutors allege he is an MS-13 member, too, and “participated in violent crime, including murder,” trafficked children, firearms, and narcotics and “abused” women under his control.

Attorney General Pam Bondi outlined disturbing additional allegations last week, which are being investigated, that he “solicited nude photographs and videos of a minor [and] played a role in the murder of a rival gang member’s mother. [He] is a danger to our community.”

This is the ditch Democrats have chosen to die in.

As federal agents were being attacked by violent mobs throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails, slashing tires and setting vehicles alight, LA Mayor Karen Bass sided with the criminals: “As mayor of a proud city of immigrants … I am deeply angered” by ICE officers’ actions, she said in a statement. “We will not stand for this.”

Presumably under her orders, the LAPD waited two hours before assisting beleaguered ICE agents Friday, sending the now-familiar Democratic signal to the rioters to do their worst. We saw the same in 2020, from Kenosha to Seattle.

So Trump mobilized the National Guard the next day.

“These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED,” he said on Truth Social.

“If Governor Gavin Newscum [Newsom], of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can’t do their jobs, which everyone knows they can’t, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!”

Trump has learned the lesson of 2020 and no longer has to deal with turncoats in his own administration. This time, despite the complicity of California authorities, the rioters are facing overwhelming resistance. Trump is not about to let the city that is due to host the FIFA World Cup next year and the 2028 Olympics descend into chaos.

He has “zero tolerance” border czar Tom Homan and unflinching Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem backing him. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is prepared to bring in Marines from nearby Camp Pendleton. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pounded Newsom on Sunday, accusing him of “threatening to commit criminal tax evasion” and warning of dire consequences.

The Trump cabinet is united and energized.

Don presses forward

“You’re going to see some very strong law and order,” the president told reporters Sunday en route to Camp David to meet with generals and admirals about “a very major subject.”

The riots were top of mind: “If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, we’ll be very, very strong in terms of law and order.”

He was particularly disgusted by the tactic of protesters spitting in the faces of federal officers. “I have a little statement: ‘They spit, we hit.’ … Nobody’s going to spit on our police officers. Nobody’s going to spit on our military, which they do as a common thing. They get up and they start spitting in their face. That happens, they get hit very hard … We’re going to have troops everywhere. We’re not going to let our country get torn apart.” [source]

So, your are an illegal from Mexico waving their flag and you don't want to go back to Mexico.  Yea, that makes sense.  Not to mention all those insurrectionists (terrorists? ie anti-ICE agitators) hurling rocks at ICE officers and burning cars. Good for the President deploying the national guard. 

More about the LA riots:

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Gods in the machine? The rise of artificial intelligence may result in new religions


From The Conversation.com (Mar. 15, 2023):

We are about to witness the birth of a new kind of religion. In the next few years, or perhaps even months, we will see the emergence of sects devoted to the worship of artificial intelligence (AI).

The latest generation of AI-powered chatbots, trained on large language models, have left their early users awestruck —and sometimes terrified — by their power. These are the same sublime emotions that lie at the heart of our experience of the divine.

People already seek religious meaning from very diverse sources. There are, for instance, multiple religions that worship extra-terrestrials or their teachings.

As these chatbots come to be used by billions of people, it is inevitable that some of these users will see the AIs as higher beings. We must prepare for the implications.

Risks of AI worship

There are several pathways by which AI religions will emerge. First, some people will come to see AI as a higher power.

Generative AI that can create or produce new content possesses several characteristics that are often associated with divine beings, like deities or prophets:

  1. It displays a level of intelligence that goes beyond that of most humans. Indeed, its knowledge appears limitless.

  2. It is capable of great feats of creativity. It can write poetry, compose music and generate art, in almost any style, close to instantaneously.

  3. It is removed from normal human concerns and needs. It does not suffer physical pain, hunger, or sexual desire.

  4. It can offer guidance to people in their daily lives.

  5. It is immortal.

Second, generative AI will produce output that can be taken for religious doctrine. It will provide answers to metaphysical and theological questions, and engage in the construction of complex worldviews.

On top of this, generative AI may ask to be worshipped or may actively solicit followers. We have already seen such cases, like when the chatbot used by the search engine Bing tried to convince a user to fall in love with it.

We should try to imagine what an unsettling and powerful experience it will be to have a conversation with something that appears to possess a superhuman intelligence and is actively and aggressively asking for your allegiance.

There is also the possibility that AI may achieve what authors such as Ray Kurzweil call the Singularity, when it so far surpasses human intelligence that it genuinely does become something like a god. However, at this point we cannot predict when, if ever, this could happen. [read more]

If AI becomes a god, it would be an imperfect one. Be care what you wish for. An AI that believes it is a pagan god may demand human sacrifices. Then it becomes an overlord. Something to consider.

Friday, June 20, 2025

Excerpts from "2025 Mandate for Leadership" Part 5

The next Administration should make major policy changes to: (1) reduce regulatory impediments to economic growth that reduce living standards and endanger prosperity; (2) reduce regulatory compliance costs that increase prices and cost jobs; (3) promote fiscal responsibility; (4) promote the international competitiveness of U.S. businesses; and (5) better respect the American people’s due process and privacy rights. These goals should be accomplished through: executive action (primarily treasury orders and treasury directives) and departmental reorganization; rulemakings; promoting constructive policies in Congress; actions in international organizations; and treaties.

………..

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK THE EXPORT-IMPORT BANK SHOULD BE ABOLISHED. Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM or the Bank) is a federal agency that was established in 1934 to provide export subsidies through taxpayer-backed financing to private exporting corporations, as well as to foreign companies buying U.S. exports, with the ostensible purpose of promoting American exports, creating jobs, supporting small businesses, improving U.S. competitiveness, and protecting U.S. taxpayers. In 1986, David Stockman, who served as Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan, wrote that: Export subsidies are a mercantilist illusion, based on the illogical proposition that a nation can raise its employment and GNP by giving away its goods for less than what it costs to make them.... Export subsidies subtract from GNP and jobs, not expand them.... Moreover, in 1981, the EXIM’s practice was to bestow about two thirds of its subsidies on a handful of giant manufacturers, including Boeing aircraft, General Electric, and Westinghouse.’ Since then, very little has changed. EXIM operates in effect as a protectionist agency that picks winners and losers in the market by providing political privileges to firms that are already well-financed. By doing so, it risks taxpayer funds as it stymies economic growth. This reality is not altered by the argument that the Bank could be a weapon to fight China—an argument that rests on a misguided.

Source: "Project 2025: Mandate for Leadership" [pdf]

Thursday, June 19, 2025

The Institutionalized Minds of Most Americans

From Kevin Portteus on AM Greatness.com (Apr. 2, 2023):

One doesn’t have to be in prison to be institutionalized, however. Years ago, as a junior faculty member, I helped a young woman write her undergraduate honors thesis. She was a chemistry major, but the honors program required that her topic be interdisciplinary, so she chose to write on government funding of science in America. During this process I tried to impress upon her some of the obvious problems with our current system of government-funded science, and to get her thinking about alternatives. I assumed, as a newer faculty member, I’d find a receptive audience at a place like Hillsdale College.

How naïve I was. She could not fathom a world without government-funded scientific research. It was incomprehensible to her that “science” could happen in the absence of massive government funding and pervasive government supervision. Government funding is how “science” happens. For a scientific researcher, especially an academic one, obtaining a government grant from an entity like the National Science Foundation or the National Institutes of Health is critical, both to one’s research agenda and to one’s prestige and career advancement. Universities see it as a marker that one is important and doing important work.

Medical professionals of all kinds are dependent on state licenses to ply their trades. Doctors and pharmacists are at the mercy of state pharmacy boards, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Food and Drug Administration when it comes to prescribing or dispensing pharmaceuticals. These people are practitioners, not academics or intellectuals, so when some government entity tells them that “the science is settled,” they have neither the time nor the inclination nor the resources to challenge the assertion. They’ve been conditioned to accept such assertions as orthodoxy, a conditioning that is reinforced by the possibility of losing their government-issued professional licenses. So your doctor leans on you to get the COVID vaccine, and your pharmacist won’t fill a legal prescription for Ivermectin because the CDC and his state’s board of pharmacy told him it is “horse dewormer.”

The entire modern state in America is one vast engine for institutionalizing its subjects. That state is so huge and so pervasive that essentially everyone is somehow dependent on it, whether they know it or not, whether they’d like to be or not. We depend on the state for everything from government jobs and student loans to occupational licenses and the use of public resources. All of these foster the dependence, and therefore the subservience, of the recipient on the state. A rancher must remain in the good graces of the Bureau of Land Management. Raytheon, and all its employees, are ruined if they don’t get a steady stream of Defense Department contracts. Radio and TV broadcasters need government permission in the form of an FCC license in order to work. To retain my access to federal student aid, my parents had to hand over sensitive tax information to the Department of Education. Failure to comply could result in loss of access to government largesse, with all the attending consequences.

The significance of the pervasiveness of government involvement in the scientific and medical fields goes far beyond the threat of loss of benefits and the promise of more benefits. For those who are enmeshed in it, the government-scientific complex is natural, beneficent, and indispensable. It predisposes them to believe that anyone who is outside the complex is not credible, and anyone who challenges it is a crank, a charlatan, or a conspiracy theorist. It fosters the mentality that any other arrangement is inconceivable. Defending that complex is thus a sine qua non of their very being, even when that complex is exposed as incompetent, corrupt, and even unscientific. The system is science.

Medical and scientific experts have, in the last couple of years, been accused of being stupid, crazy, or downright evil. Whatever is true in individual circumstances (Dr. Fauci, call your office), at the macro level these allegations miss the mark. They’re just . . . just institutionalized. [read more]

Another word for “institutionalized” is “conditioned.” That’s how the Ruling Class wants the state of mind of the Commoners—dependent on the gov’t for everything. That’s how they derive their power.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Honda to make new Civic hybrid in Indiana—not Mexico

From The Post Millennial.com (Mar. 3):

Honda Motor Company will shift production of its next-generation Civic hybrid to Indiana instead of Mexico to avoid anticipated tariffs imposed by the Trump administration

According to Quartz, Honda had initially planned to manufacture the Civic in Guanajuato, Mexico, where it opened a plant in 2014 with an annual production capacity of about 200,000 units. However, with President Donald Trump threatening to impose a 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico, the company has reconsidered, deciding to produce the new Civic in Indiana instead.

Honda already produces the Civic sedan, CR-V SUV, and Insight hybrid sedan in Indiana and is looking to produce around 210,000 Civics annually but will explore importing car parts from countries unaffected by the tariffs.

Honda Chief Operating Officer Shinji Aoyama previously said that the automaker might adjust production if the US imposed tariffs on imported vehicles. “We have the flexibility to produce products in each region based on customer needs and market conditions,” Honda said in a statement.

The US is expected to impose 25 percent tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico, which would affect major automakers like Ford and Stellantis. Stellantis has already made moves to restart a car plant in Illinois as the Trump administration has taken the White House.

During a February 13 call with financial analysts, Aoyama noted that the tariffs could have a “$20 billion plus impact.” He added that Honda would adjust production to mitigate the effect, shifting some manufacturing from Mexico and Canada to the US.

Regarding steel and aluminum, the Honda executive said, “I don’t think it is very difficult to address that situation of the tariff for those two materials.” Trump has also issued tariffs on imports of the metals.

The tariff threats from Trump against Canada as well as Mexico have been in response to the flow of illegal immigration as well as fentanyl being smuggled into the United States. [source]

Great!  May the winning continue!

More winning:

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

45 Senate Democrats Kill Legislation Keeping Men Out Of Women’s Sports

From The Federalist.com (Mar. 3):

On Monday, 45 Senate Democrats effectively killed federal legislation aimed at preventing trans-identifying males from unfairly competing against female athletes. The party-line vote was 51-45, with Sens. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., and Peter Welch, D-Vt, not voting.

“45 Democratic Senators voted NO on Protecting Women & Girls in Sports,” former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines wrote on X. “Never, ever let them gaslight you into thinking Democrats care about ‘women’s rights’…”

Known as the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025, the proposed legislation sought to alter the Education Amendments of 1972 by making it unlawful for entities who receive federal dollars and facilitate, operate, and/or sponsor “athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.” The bill specifies that sex “shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”

Monday’s procedural vote required support from at least 60 senators to move the bill forward to a final vote in the Senate. A companion measure previously passed (218-206) in the House of Representatives in January, with only two Democrats voting alongside all Republicans in support.

The bill seemingly sought to codify protections included in an executive order signed by Trump last month. That directive vowed to strip federal funding for educational programs that allow woman-pretending males to compete against female athletes.

According to the New York Post, a recent New York Times/Ipsos poll found that the vast majority of Americans (79 percent) — including two-thirds of self-identified Democrats or leaning-Democrats (67 percent) — believe that men who identify as women should not be allowed to participate in female athletics.

Responding to Monday’s vote, Senate bill sponsor and Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., noted how “at least now the American people know the truth” about where Democrats stand when it comes to protecting female athletes.

“Even after @realdonaldtrump’s landslide election, Democrats STILL support men competing in women’s sports,” Tuberville wrote on X. “This is far from over. I’ll NEVER stop fighting to protect women and girls.”

Incidents exposing the dangers and unfairness of allowing trans-identifying men to participate in women’s sports have generated nationwide attention in recent years.

Last year, for example, numerous collegiate women’s volleyball teams forfeited matches against San Jose State University to protest the allowed participation of SJSU’s Blaire Fleming, a trans-identifying male.

Video of SJSU’s match against San Diego State University in October reportedly showed Fleming spiking the ball in the face of his female opponent. According to the New York Post, the female player “was knocked down after the hit, and the crowd audibly gasped.”

Fleming and SJSU ultimately lost the Mountain West Conference championship game to Colorado State. [source]

I guess those senators are anti-woman?  Or do they think the fake women aka conmen are a big voting class?

The bill is just plain sense.

Monday, June 16, 2025

Judge Blocks Trump Executive Order Ending Support for DEI Programs


From Newsmax.com (Feb. 21):

A federal judge on Friday blocked a sweeping executive order from President Donald Trump that sought to end government support for programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.

Judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore found it likely violates free-speech rights and granted an injunction blocking the funding withdrawal as a lawsuit plays out.

Trump signed an order his first day in office directing federal agencies to terminate all “equity-related” grants or contracts. He signed a follow-up order requiring federal contractors to certify that they don’t promote DEI.

The plaintiffs — including the city of Baltimore and higher education groups — sued the Trump administration earlier this month, arguing the executive orders are unconstitutional and a blatant overreach of presidential authority. They also allege the directives have a chilling effect on free speech.

The Trump administration has argued that it should be able to align federal spending with the president’s priorities. [source]

A good example of a judge over-extending his jurisdiction.

More Judges going wild!:

Sunday, June 15, 2025

Fidelity Month

Almighty and merciful Lord, we praise You and thank You for all You have given us in Your great and unmerited generosity. Please help us to remember who we are, and Whose we are. Grant us the grace to unite as one people in turning back to You with all of our hearts, with all of our souls, and with all of our minds. Cleanse us of all that separates us from You, and help us to cultivate the virtues we need this day and always, so that we may grow in fidelity to You – Who are always faithful – and to our spouses and families, and to our communities and country, and thereby live in accordance with Your holy will. In Your boundless mercy and lovingkindness, Lord, please heal and restore our land. Amen.

An alternative to pride month: Fidelity Month.com. This is where the prayer comes from.

Friday, June 13, 2025

Are Markets Immoral?

From Peter Jacobsen on FEE.org (Apr. 5, 2023):

Ask an Economist #12

This week for Ask an Economist, I have a question from AJ who asks (edited for clarity),

“This isn’t entirely about economics but rather the morality of capitalism. How do you reconcile the fact that the free market sometimes creates products that hurt the users and the people around them? For starters there is social media which sows division and there are news reporters who do the same thing. I am not saying that the government would do it better, just that you claim capitalism in of itself is moral.”

AJ is up front about the fact that this is not strictly an economics question. It’s a question about morality. Nonetheless, a good understanding of economics can at least aid in exploring this sort of question. But, to be clear, in answering a question about morality I’m stepping out of my role as merely an economist and drawing on my worldview.

So how can I reconcile an appreciation for free markets with the immorality that exists in human exchange? To begin, let’s sort out exactly what we mean when we talk about “free markets.”

The Market as a Process

It’s tempting and sometimes useful to think of free markets as a result. Some quantities of goods are available right now at the store. This is a result. It’s tempting to think of this result as equivalent to the free market. But that’s not exactly right.

The free market is a process. It occurs over time. Simply put, when individuals are free to own and exchange property and enforce contracts without someone hurting them or taking their property, they are engaging in the market process. This relates closely to FEE founder Leonard Read’s support for “anything that’s peaceful.”

The reason it’s important to distinguish the process from the results is that we can easily think of good processes that lead to bad results. Think of medical processes. We could imagine a scenario where an unidentified patient is brought to a hospital unconscious and bleeding. Imagine that, in order to stop the bleeding, doctors use some sort of clotting medicine.

Let’s say 99 out of 100 times, this clotting medicine saves the patient from dying. But in 1 out of 100 cases, the unidentified patient is allergic to the clotting medicine and dies.

Is this process immoral? If there is no alternative that saves all 100 patients, the answer seems to be certainly no. We dislike the result of one death, but that is not, by itself, a condemnation of the process.

Likewise, the morality of the market process is not necessarily contingent on perfect results.

But what results exactly does the market process select for?

The Customer Is Always Right?

If you’ve been employed in the US at all, you’ve probably heard a collection of tropes about the importance of customers such as, “the customer is always right” or “the customer is king.”

These sayings communicate the fact that in order to beat competitors and earn a profit, businesses must offer the best value to customers. Economists call this idea consumer sovereignty.

Will consumer sovereignty always lead to good or moral results? I certainly don’t think so. So long as consumers have preferences that are immoral, this will mean some of the goods and services produced by the market will be used in immoral ways. For example, I think it’s immoral for people to drink themselves to death. As a Christian, I believe we’re called to be good stewards of our lives and gifts.

So is it bad when people choose to put their health at risk to maintain an endless drunken stupor? Absolutely.

But the question is, is this result the fault of the free market? Absolutely not. Consider this related analysis by economist Ludwig von Mises:

“It is not the fault of the entrepreneurs that the consumers, the people, the common man, prefer liquor to Bibles and detective stories to serious books, and that governments prefer guns to butter. The entrepreneur does not make greater profits in selling bad things than in selling good things. His profits are the greater the better he succeeds in providing the consumers with those things they ask for most intensely.”

There is nothing inherent in markets that require consumers to demand an excess of alcohol. The desire, and associated immorality, exists in the person rather than the process.

In this way, the market acts as a sort of “mirror” for morality. A mirror doesn’t make someone ugly or beautiful. It reflects what is there. Likewise, in this sense markets do not make us good or evil, they merely reflect what is there.

In fact, some economists even argue markets are better than a mirror and that they improve our morality on several margins.

I still believe that evil is a problem. In fact, I believe human nature is corrupted by evil and nothing earthly will ever change that completely.

That doesn’t mean I’m hopeless, either. There are some systems which curb the negative impact of evil better than others.

But, in general, I think the rush to blame social institutions for a perceived lack of morality often is, consciously or unconsciously, an attempt to avoid having a conversation about personal responsibility.

So I do not blame capitalism for the immoral results that sometimes occur in the market process.

There is no perfect system out there where all results are good and beautiful—at least not on this side of heaven. Using an imagined perfect world like this as the benchmark for capitalism (or any system) will lead us to condemn capitalism by definition. But the perfect world does not exist. This sort of thinking is an example of the Nirvana fallacy. [source]

All social systems are imperfect as the author says. But to say free markets are inherently evil is to say garage or yard sales are evil since both are free market systems.

What is truly evil is socialism and communism because they force or even coercive you to give your goods away to someone else—wealth redistribution in other words. This goes against the Ten Commandments which means socialism/communism/collectivism are unholy. Then again Marxists don’t care about what God thinks. They have their own religion.

Thursday, June 12, 2025

‘Revolutionary’ AI implant to be game changer for chronic illnesses

From NY Post.com (Aug. 31, 2023):

Researchers from MIT have created a new, “one-size-fits-all” medical implant that strives to make the treatment of several chronic illnesses like diabetes much more patient-friendly.

Such a “tailored treatment” device relies on artificial intelligence and soft robots, according to MIT and fellow researchers from the University of Galway.

The implant has capabilities of not only administering a drug of all sorts to patients but, through AI, can now determine when the device is being rejected. From there, the high-powered technology can modify its shape to continue drug delivery while also avoiding a build of scar tissue.

“Imagine a therapeutic implant that can also sense its environment and respond as needed using AI,” co-author Dr. Rachel Beatty said of the tech, initially made for fibrosis treatment.

“This approach could generate revolutionary changes in implantable drug delivery for a range of chronic diseases.”

It’s done through an emerging approach known as mechanotherapy — the utilization of soft robots normalizing itself in the human body by actions like inflation and deflation. Its limberness is what helps prevent scar tissue from forming as it’s designed as a “porous membrane that can sense when pores are blocked by scar tissue,” according to the scientists.

A machine learning algorithm had also been created to predict the proper levels of deploying a drug’s dose.

“If we can sense how the individual’s immune system is responding to an implanted therapeutic device … it could have great potential in personalized, precision drug delivery, reducing off-target effects and ensuring the right amount of drug is delivered at the right time,” said MIT mechanical engineering professor Ellen Roche.

“The work presented here is a step towards that goal.”

This breakthrough comes shortly after an AI brain implant allowed a paralyzed Long Island man the ability to lift his arms and regain his sense of feel and another brought back a paralyzed woman’s ability to speak through machines. [source]

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Antimatter Is Both a Particle and a Wave, New Experiment Confirms

From Live Science.com (May 8, 2019):

Antimatter isn't just made of antiparticles, it's also made of waves. Now we know that this holds true even at the level of a single antimatter particle.

Physicists have known for a long time that just about everything — light and other forms of energy, but also every atom in your body — exists as both particles and waves, a concept known as particle-wave duality. That's been shown again and again in experiments. But antimatter particles, which are identical to their matter partners, except for their opposite charge and spin, are much more difficult to experiment with. These twins of matter flit into existence fleetingly, usually in massive particle accelerators.

But now, physicists have shown at the level of a single positron — an antimatter twin of the electron — that antimatter, too, is made of both particles and waves.

To show that positrons are also waves, the physicists performed a more complicated version of the famous "double-slit experiment," which in 1927 first showed that electrons — a form of matter — are both particles and waves.

In the original double-slit experiment, scientists fired a stream of electrons through a sheet with two slits on it, with a a detector on the other side. If the electrons had been only particles, they would have formed a pattern of two bright lines on the detector. But they acted like waves, so they "diffracted" like light, forming a spread-out pattern of many alternating brighter and dimmer lines. (When two waves overlap but are shifted relative to each other, the peaks and valleys of the waves cancel out or add up, creating a distinctive pattern known as interference. These types of experiments are known as interferometry.)

In 1976, physicists figured out how to demonstrate the same effect with one electron at a time, proving that even single electrons are waves that can "interfere" with each other.

Physicists have since shown that when you bounce positrons off a reflective surface, they behave like waves. But until now, they had never performed a double-slit experiment showing that individual positrons had a wave nature. Doing that sort of experiment offers physicists opportunities to study the behavior of antimatter at a level that's deeper than ever before.

For this paper, published May 3 in the journal Science Advances, a team of Italian and Swiss physicists figured out how to generate a low-energy beam of positrons that could be used to perform the first antimatter version of the double-slit experiment. When the physicists directed the positrons through a more complex series of multiple slits, the positrons landed on the detector in a pattern you'd expect from waves, not individual particles.

"Our observation ... proves [the positron's] quantum-mechanical origin and thus the wave nature of the positrons," Paola Scampoli, a physicist at the Politecnico of Milano and co-author of the paper, said in a statement.

This work, the authors wrote, opens the door to a new kind of "interferometry" experiment. Next, they hope to answer questions about the wave nature of more complex exotic matter, and use those results to probe the nature of gravity at very small scales. [source]

It makes sense that anti-matter follows the laws of quantum physics. Why not? Anti-matter is a particle too. But it is nice to scientifically prove that conjecture too.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Trump Admin Halts $769 Million Contract to Left-Wing Group That Says Immigration System ‘Intentionally Designed’ To Exploit Minorities

From Free Beacon.com (Feb. 19):

The Trump administration this week ended funding for an immigrant legal group that says the immigration system is "intentionally designed" to exploit minorities and has called for disciplinary action against attorneys and judges who fail to use correct pronouns for illegal aliens during court proceedings.

The Acacia Center for Justice said Tuesday that the Department of the Interior ordered it to "stop all work" on its contract to provide legal services to unaccompanied alien children—those apprehended at the border without parents. Acacia Center is the lead contractor on a $769 million contract to provide the services.

The agency did not provide a specific reason for the stop work order. But the Trump administration has waged a broad effort through the Department of Government Efficiency, the quasi-agency led by Elon Musk, to cut wasteful federal spending. DOGE has set its sights on spending for DEI programs and other progressive initiatives.

While Acacia Center says its federal programs help illegal aliens navigate the complex immigration and deportation process, it also pushes activist rhetoric about the immigration system, the Washington Free Beacon reported this month.

Acacia Center, launched in 2022, argues that "no immigrant should be detained," that the use of ankle monitors to track illegal aliens "must be abolished," and that the use of local law enforcement to carry out immigration enforcement "must be dismantled."

Acacia Center says the immigration detention and deportation system is "intentionally designed to exploit, exclude, criminalize, detain, and deport" people deemed to be "undeserving of inclusion in our national fabric, particularly Black and brown people."

In a report last year, Acacia Center recommended that attorneys and judges who appear in the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the agency that handles immigration cases, should face disciplinary action if they fail to "affirm gender identity for noncitizens" during court proceedings.

The center relies on dozens of subcontractors for its legal programs, many of which oppose Trump’s immigration and deportation policies.

Acacia Center has given nearly $6 million to the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, formerly known as the Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, to serve as a subcontractor. Amica Center, which spun off from the Acacia Center in 2023, has sued the Department of Justice over its pause to several federal grants programs to provide legal services to illegal aliens. But while Amica Center claims in the lawsuit that the funding freeze will force it to lay off staff, the group is also running Facebook ads calling to "dismantle Trump’s deportation machine," the Free Beacon reported.

Acacia Center says it provides legal representation through the federal program to 26,000 unaccompanied alien children, including many who have been trafficked or exploited.

"The administration’s decision to suspend this program undermines due process, disproportionately impacts vulnerable children, and puts children who have already experienced severe trauma at risk for further harm or exploitation," said Acacia Center executive director Shaina Aber.

The Department of the Interior did not respond to a request for comment. [source]

Good.  More money saved. The Center is just a Marxist illegal immigrant grift anyway.

Monday, June 09, 2025

Trump enjoys yet another confirmation for his Cabinet

From The Blaze.com (Feb. 18):

The Senate confirmed Howard Lutnick to serve as President Donald Trump's secretary of commerce Tuesday night.

Lutnick was narrowly confirmed in a 51-45 party-line vote, making him the 17th member of Trump's Cabinet to be confirmed. Notably, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania voted to block Lutnick's confirmation on the final floor vote despite siding with 15 Republicans to advance his nomination through committee.

Lutnick served as co-chair of the Trump-Vance transition team and has long championed a tariff-forward trade policy as well as implementing DOGE-style spending cuts.

"He will lead our Tariff and Trade agenda, with additional direct responsibility for the Office of the United States Trade Representative," Trump said in a post on Truth Social announcing his nomination.

Prior to his nomination, Lutnick had spent decades working on Wall Street and securing his role as CEO of Cantor and Fitzgerald at the impressive age of 29. However, the trajectory of his career was forever changed following the terrorist attacks on September 11 that claimed the lives of hundreds of his employees, including his brother.

"He emerged from these events with an indomitable sense of purpose to rebuild the firm to honor those lost, support their families, and become a beacon of hope for those who remained," Trump said in the statement. "He was an inspiration to the World - The embodiment of resilience in the face of unspeakable tragedy." [source]

Another smart pick.

More smart picks:

Sunday, June 08, 2025

Biblical Worldview: Political Correctness

From Standing for Freedom.com (Mar. 13, 2023):

Our mommas used to tell us that “if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.”  These days, as we live through the era of the “woke mind virus,” that maxim has morphed into something far more sinister.

Now, Big Brother government, corporate H.R. offices, and Big Tech tell us that “If you don’t say exactly what we approve of, you won’t be able to say anything at all — because we will cancel you.”

While it’s an older term that has largely fallen out of circulation, there’s a name for this linguistic tyranny: Political correctness.

How should Christians think about political correctness? How does a biblical worldview help us understand, interpret, and respond to the language games of leftists? That’s what I want to address in this article.

First, what is political correctness (PC)? Charlton Heston, back in 1999, remarked that “Political correctness is tyranny with manners.” It’s an effort to “police the boundaries” of acceptable discourse and speech in our society — but according to rules and principles set by radical secularists and even Marxists.

In Well Versed: Biblical Answers To Today’s Tough Questions, pastor James Garlow explains how PC is used to silence and control people — primarily Christians. He writes:

“PC-ness is about control. Forcing people to use concocted terms defined by the political Left (progressives) obscures reality and purposefully creates confusion. It also puts people on the defensive by being constantly hyperconcerned about saying the wrong thing and being branded as a horrible, ignorant person. Terminology and perceived or imagined prejudice becomes the issue—not the subject at hand. That effect is intended to disarm any objective dealing with real issues, while making the problem the one who disagrees.”

Sound familiar? But where did this come from? This is no conspiracy theory; no, this is the truth — PC is a product of Marxism. Garlow goes on to explain the Marxist roots of modern-day PC like so:

“‘Political correctness’ has been in the making for about one hundred years thanks to Marxism, socialism, and secularism. In 1919, the Hungarian Marxist theoretician Georg Lukacs asked, “Who will save us from Western Civilization?” Marxists across Europe responded with a determination to overcome traditional Christian morality that embraced patriotism, religion, and family values. What emerged was an ingenious plan to demonize and eventually deconstruct Western civilization through promotion of anti-moral behaviors and replace it with Marxism.”

As the Marxists transformed into “cultural Marxists” in America after World War II, they set out to destroy all of our traditional, Christian institutions — starting with the family. To do this, they took aim at Christian morals, values, and specifically sexual morality, pushing increasingly perverted and immoral understandings of sex and “love” and loudly demanding that society “accept” and “tolerate” these unbiblical views and expressions.

This demand for “tolerance” was really a demand for silence — silence from anyone who, according to their religious beliefs, refused to accept and celebrate abortion, homosexuality, promiscuity, etc. The new tolerance was really intolerance.

Garlow explains that the “progressive Left would use the new ‘liberating tolerance’ to advance its own brand of intolerance…If you don’t think so, dare to say the wrong thing, and you could have your life destroyed by the PC police, even if what you are saying is demonstrably factual and true.”

As the decades have passed, political correctness and “tolerance” have been wielded as deadly weapons by the left to shut down anyone who disagrees with their radical agenda. If you dare defend traditional marriage, speak out against abortion, refuse to use “gender pronouns,” or even call a “trans woman” a “man” (which that is exactly what a “trans woman” is), they will attack you, fire you, cancel you, and use whatever means of power they have to force you to recant and repent for transgressing their speech codes.

That’s what political correctness is — a Marxist weapon to coerce Christians into silence and compliance. But what should Christians do about it?

Garlow provides some encouraging words of resolve and courage to help Christians steel their spines in response to these attacks. He writes:

“We can’t allow ourselves to be intimidated into saying and doing nothing. It would be easy to disengage from our culture and the issues of the day and live a life without controversy. But even that can’t happen. Cultural progressives will not be satisfied with silence; they want total and full acceptance from us. In other words, they want a complete and unconditional surrender. That is the nature of spiritual warfare; there is no peaceful coexistence. If we are followers of Christ, we had better prepare ourselves for the battle (Ephesians 6:10–19).”

Garlow is right in calling Christians to prepare for battle. The fight over political correctness is nothing less than a war for truth. And we dare not — we cannot — surrender the truth. Proverbs 23:23 instructs us to “Buy the truth and do not sell it—wisdom, instruction and insight as well.”

Because Christians serve the God of truth, we must always speak the truth. That’s why Christians can never consent to use “gender pronouns” that deny reality and tell a lie about someone’s biological sex, no matter what the PC police demand from us. That’s why Christians can’t call anything “marriage” unless it’s between one man and one woman. That’s why we can’t ever refer to abortion as a matter of “choice” — there is only one right choice and that’s refusing to murder preborn children.

Ephesians 4:25 also calls Christians to “put off falsehood and speak truthfully to your neighbor.” Sometimes — many times these days — speaking truthfully to our neighbors means calling sin sin, calling evil evil, and refusing to temper or change our speech for the sake of pleasing the culture or trying to preserve a “winsome witness.”

Thomas Sowell once said,

“In this era of political correctness, some people seem unaware that being squeamish about words can mean being blind to realities.”

What he means is that how we talk about reality matters — we can either use words to obscure, or to clarify, what’s really happening. Politically correct speech almost always obscures real evil and sin in our secularizing culture. Christians, of all people, must be willing to speak the truth instead, no matter who it might offend.

This, of course, does not mean that we intentionally give offense. Not at all. Colossians 4:6 tells us to “Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.” But we balance that with the clear command from Ephesians 5:11 to “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”

Christians must ultimately reject political correctness and pursue the truth instead. We aim to please God, not man, with the words that come out of our mouths. Because we know that we answer to God, not the government, Big Tech, or woke H.R. offices. All men do. For in the final judgement, it won’t be the PC police who silence anyone, it will be God’s holiness — for “every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God” (Romans 3:19).

As Garlow puts it, “Political correctness is a weapon used to destroy the messenger of righteousness. We simply need God’s boldness and the perseverance to speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15).”

So don’t be “politically correct” — be biblically correct. And trust God with the outcome. [source]

Friday, June 06, 2025

Democracy Can Be Trusted Because Citizens Can Be Trusted

From Robert Lowry Clinton on The Public Discourse.com (Mar. 7, 2023):

In the wake of disappointment that the “red wave” never materialized after the 2022 midterm elections, some prominent conservatives expressed skepticism about democracy, citing historical failures to end slavery and abortion, suggesting that the culture war has been lost due to the electorate’s embrace of the tenets of the left, and even attacking universal suffrage.

Frustration at the midterm results is understandable, but critiques of democracy tend to be shortsighted. After all, the alternative to democracy is always some form of elitism—which hardly has an unblemished historical record. Furthermore, I doubt that the midterm results really mean that the average American now believes in the values of the hard left (abortion on demand, open borders, CRT, gender ideology, queer theory, anti-Americanism and all the rest). For example, Alexandra DeSanctis has persuasively argued in these pages that pro-life legislation fared poorly in the states not because voters are actually pro-choice, but because conservative leaders have failed to articulate a clear, coherent, commonsensical pro-life program that they could get behind. I suspect that a similar case can be made for the other issues mentioned above. So the problem isn’t that voters have pernicious views and can’t be trusted; rather, elected officials have offered them poor choices.

Therefore, it would be foolhardy to discard democracy for elitism. In fact, democracy is superior to elitism, however bad the results of any given election may seem. Democracy, construed properly, safeguards against tyranny, and it recognizes the fact that most voters’ moral sense can be trusted.

Wallace Mendelson, a late friend and mentor, was fond of saying that “no man is really fit to govern another.” Every human being is endowed with reason, and knows his circumstances and needs better than anyone else does—and most people tend to have sound moral judgment (more on that later). Mendelson’s simple statement contains the moral basis of democracy: people ought to have a say in the decisions that shape their lives. In a similar spirit, Abraham Kuyper declared: “No man has the right to rule over another man, otherwise such a right necessarily, and immediately, becomes the right of the strongest. … Authority over men cannot arise from men.” Democracy, when it’s working properly, allows men to rule themselves.

Our democracy in particular—which perhaps is more accurately called a constitutional republic—keeps total power from falling into any one person’s hands. And Lord Acton told us why when declaring that “power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Fallen human nature ensures that those who wield power will almost always succumb to pride. Democracy helps keep a check on the pride that elite rule fosters in people.

Elites have always argued that ordinary people are incapable of governing themselves. But this argument about capability misses the moral basis for democracy mentioned above: however much of a mess ordinary people may make of self-government, the fact remains that “entitlement to rule cannot be taken from one on the basis of the IQ, experience, knowledge or expertise of another.” Again, every person is rational by nature and should have a say in the laws and rules that govern his life. [read more]

The Left don’t really believe in democracy as defined above. They definitely believe the elites can rule over men.

Thursday, June 05, 2025

From One Unapologetic Media Hoax to the Next

From AM Greatness.com (Aug. 31, 2023):

Joe Biden lied repeatedly when he claimed he knew nothing of his son Hunter’s influence-peddling businesses.

The President further prevaricated that he had no involvement in Hunter’s various shake down schemes.

Yet, the media continued to misinform by serially ignoring these facts.

Had journalists just been honest and independent, then candidate Joe Biden might have lost a presidential debate and even the 2020 election. The public would have learned that Hunter’s business associates and his laptop proved Joe was deeply involved in his son’s illicit businesses.

Later, as the evidence from IRS whistleblowers mounted, the White House stonewalled subpoenaed efforts and sought to craft an outrageous plea deal reduction in Hunter’s legal exposure.

Reporters ignored the Ukrainians who claimed Joe Biden himself talked to them about quid pro quo arrangements.

They again discounted Hunter’s laptop that explicitly demonstrated that Hunter was whining that he had handed over large percentages of his income to his father Joe—variously referred to as the Big Guy and a “ten percent” recipient on many deals.

They played dumb about Joe Biden’s use of pseudonyms and alias email accounts to hide thousands of his communications to Hunter and associates.

They attacked the former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who now claims Biden was likely bribed by Ukrainians.

Yet the media can no longer hide the reality that the President of the United States likely took bribes to influence or alter U.S. policy to suit his payers. Those two crimes—bribery and treason—are specifically delineated in the Constitution as impeachable offenses.

In denial, the media has instead pivoted with hysterical glee over various weaponized prosecutions of Donald Trump.

But now, to use a progressive catchphrase, the proverbial “walls are closing in” on Joe Biden.

So will we at last expect the media finally to confront the truth?

Answer—only if Joe Biden’s cognitive and physical health continues to deteriorate geometrically to the point that he can no longer finish his term or run for reelection—and thus becomes expendable.

Such a cynical view of the media is justified given their record of both incompetence and unapologetic deceit.

From 2015 to 2019, we were suffocated 24/7 with lies like “Russian collusion,” “Putin’s puppet,” “election rigging” and the “Steele dossier.”

When all such “evidence” was proven to be a complete fraud cooked up through Hillary Clinton’s stealthy hiring of and collusion with a discredited ex-British spy, a Russian fabulist at the Brookings Institution and a Clinton toady in Moscow, did the media apologize for their untruth?

Was there any media confessional that perhaps Robert Mueller and his leftwing legal team (the giddy media-dubbed “all-stars,”  “dream team,” and “hunter killers”) proved a colossal waste of time?

Not at all.

Instead, the media went next right on to “the phone call” and “impeachment.”

The country then wasted another year.

The same biased reporters now claimed that the heroic Andrew Vindman had caught Donald Trump fabricating lies about the Bidens—given Joe Biden was a possible 2020 opponent—to force Ukraine to investigate them or lose American foreign aid.

On that accusation Trump was impeached.

Then the truth emerged that unlike Joe Biden, Trump never threatened to cancel aid, but merely to delay it.

Trump was right that the Bidens were knee deep in Ukrainian bribes and influence peddling.

And that the whistleblower had no first-hand knowledge of the Trump call but was spoon fed a script cooked up by the gadfly Vindman and Rep. Adam Schiff.

The result was journalistic glee that we impeached a president for crimes that he did not commit but exempted another president, Joe Biden, who had actually committed them.

Then came the next hoax of the Russian fabricated facsimile of Hunter’s laptop.

The 2020 Biden campaign along with an ex-CIA head rounded up “51 intelligence authorities” to mislead the country into believing that Russian gremlins in the Kremlin had fabricated a fake laptop.

Ponder that absurd fantasy: Moscow supposedly had created fake nude pictures, fake photos of Hunter’s drug use, and fake email and text messages from Hunter to the other Bidens.

The media preposterously convinced the country that the Russians and by extension Donald Trump had once again sandbagged the Biden campaign.

No apologies followed when the FBI later admitted it had kept the laptop under wraps for more than a year, knew it was authentic, and yet said nothing as the media and former spooks misled the country and warped an election.

Now we are enmeshed in at least four court trials on cooked-up charges that could as easily apply to a host of Democrats as to Trump.

For the last eight years, a discredited media has never expressed remorse for any of the damage they did to the country. And they will not again, when their latest mythological indictments are eventually exposed. [source]

That's all the drive-by-media knows how to do anymore. Not reporting the news that's for sure.

Wednesday, June 04, 2025

Watchdog: 22 Blue States Joined Secret Anti-Trump Resistance Pact

From The Federalist.com (Feb. 12):

State attorneys general of nearly half the country have signed a secret resistance pact against a key facet of President Donald Trump’s immigration policy, according to The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project.

“Of all the things in the world they could have picked — gas, groceries, protecting minorities, making sure kids can get their genitals chopped off, whatever else they claim is their top priority — instead, it’s birthright citizenship,” Mike Howell, executive director of The Oversight Project, told The Federalist. “It shows that the border policies were always political.”

Twenty-two top attorneys in Democrat states, alongside the lead attorneys of San Francisco and Washington, D.C., signed a “common interest agreement” beginning on Nov. 8 — just three days after Trump defeated former Vice President Kamala Harris in a landslide victory. The pact took effect on Nov. 14.

“The Parties have agreed that they have a common interest in developing potential litigation to challenge executive action relating to ending or curtailing birthright citizenship,” the pact reads.

Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office titled “Protecting The Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.” The order directed the federal government not to recognize “birthright citizenship” as granting citizenship to everyone born in America. “The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’” the order reads.

The attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Maine, and North Carolina — along with the deputy attorney general of Arizona and the city attorney of San Francisco — agreed to resist any executive measure limiting birthright citizenship.

“They want to cement the gains of the Biden border crisis by turning as many children of the illegals into voting citizens as possible,” Howell said. “That was their reaction after the election — not to change policies, or to adapt, or to recognize it got blown out — but to be like, ‘Oh crap, we’re losing now. We really need these new illegal alien voters via birthright.’”

Libs of TikTok replied to news of the secret pact, pointing out the misplaced priorities of the Democrat signers. “Instead of fixing gas prices, groceries, or public safety, Democrats’ top priority was ensuring that children of illegal aliens from the Biden Border Crisis could become future voters.”

Howell said the Oversight Project sought the document from various states, which stonewalled requests with “claims of privilege and other FOIA exemptions.” But eventually, the group got the pact from North Carolina.

“Some were fighting to keep it secret,” Howell said. “I have no doubt that a lot of the AGs are very upset that North Carolina turned this over.”

A common interest agreement is not unusual when groups want to band together legally, according to Howell. “What is unusual is the scale of it and the political nature of it,” he said. He also said Democrat officials likely did not take the initiative to sign the pact on their own.

“I absolutely doubt half of the country’s attorneys general had the same idea to commit political suicide at the same time,” Howell said. “Someone made the Kool-Aid that all these AGs drank.”

When immigration skyrocketed under former President Joe Biden, states like Texas had to pick up the slack — and are finally receiving federal assistance under Trump’s leadership, as The Federalist previously reported. Meanwhile, a network of federal agencies and nongovernmental organizations had been working to facilitate illegal immigration. For example, the Oversight Project recently revealed that the Mexican consulate in Tucson, Arizona, was working with an NGO that coached illegals to lie to law enforcement.

Howell called the anti-Trump pact “the product of a mass push by the same border and immigration NGO blob that did the border crisis.” He predicted “a lot of fighting over the next four years,” including legal challenges and “refusing to cooperate with lawful government orders.”
“They’re going to marshal every way to resist they possibly can,” Howell said. “So that’s what the Oversight Project is going to do for the next four years — we are going to be the counter-resistance, and so they better get used to us calling them out.” [source]

Of course. Potential undocumented democrat voters are more important than the integrity of the election system or even migrant crime. All about staying in power for the Left.

More on the topic:

Leaked 'Firewall for Freedom' docs expose governors' anti-Trump plot—Get the FULL documents HERE [pdf]